Zack Snyder’s Justice League Review – Spoiler Free

That film you saw in 2017, but this time its 4 hours.

The blog is revived, and the only thing that could revive it was a four hour long overindulgent Justice League film… and the 30+ movies I need to watch between now and the Oscars on the 25th April). Yes, it is actually four hours long and I watched it in one sitting with some friends in a discord chat.

The film kicks off and immediately there are warning signs. We were all making comments in the chat about the weirdness of the scene selection and some very strange music choices. Then when a random woman decides to break out into what sounded like a Viking love song, I quietly accepted that the rumours may not be true, and this movie might not be the fun surprise I’d read about.

It’s difficult to really talk about this as a movie. It’s not, no film should be 4 hours long. That’s a TV show worth of run time. WandaVision (more on that later) clocked in at 5 hours and 50 minutes, and that was spread over 9 episodes and 8 weeks. You can’t go into this Justice League without having scheduled the time. It’s not a movie you can stick on because you come across it and think “oh why not”. That being said by the end of it, I felt it had flown by, and that’s always a good sign. I am not going to mention the run time much more, because it is what it is. This is Zack Snyder’s truest and most indulgent version of Justice League, and he wanted 4 hours, so here we are.

The Justice League film from 2017 hit an odd place for me. It had some really fun moments but lacked so much in the way of set up and explanation. Things just happen at such a pace you’re not able to follow exactly why or how. Zack Snyder’s family issues meant the film was thrown at Josh Whedon, and he was told to cut the footage down to a two hour run time. Having now seen how much they had to cut to make it fit that bizarre mandate from the studio, it’s no wonder we ended up with the film we saw back then.

Zack Snyder’s Justice League tells a very similar story to the 2017 effort, but this time we are given far more context for it all. One small change to how Lois Lane arrives in a certain scene, elevated it from silly to sensical. That step is repeated in several places throughout the film, and to varying levels. Little moments from the other film that had me scratching my head are now explained and as a huge fan of nerd culture and particularly these characters, it was really quite refreshing to watch the conversations and relationship build between them. In 2017 they come together because that what the film demanded. In this film we are shown why each character has chosen to join the fight. Particular attention is given to Flash and Cyborg, who don’t have set up movies, and this film uses the extra time to set them up well.

That character development isn’t just for the good guys either. We spend a lot more time understanding what Steppenwolf’s motivations are. He is essentially trying to win back the trust of his family by taking earth for Darkseid. For those who don’t know, Thanos was Marvel’s reaction to Darkseid back in the 70’s. The presence of Darksied throughout casts an ominous shadow that genuinely got me intrigued about a future film.

By the way, it’s pronounced “Darkside”. I don’t know why it’s spelt that way.

When I was a kid, I played with actions figures a lot. My Saturday mornings were often spent at my nan’s house, smashing batman figures into each other and letting my imagination run wild. Zack Snyder is a lot older than me, but I imagine he has similar memories. The action in this film is slightly different to the 2017 effort, and for me it works much better. The final act of the film contains a set piece that put a smile on my face, and took me back to being a child imaging the justice league messing up bad guys. We’ve been blessed with the MCU giving us moments like that, and this is the first time in a DC film I’ve felt like that.

Zack Snyder’s name is in the title, and therefore you know what you’re getting in terms of visuals. There is what can only be described as a “Fuck Load” of slow-motion action shots. I get that they look cool in moments, but this is a 3-and-a-half-hour film if you showed these moments at full speed. In the wonder woman bank scene, which is edited slightly different in this film, there is less slow-motion and it looks incredible when she’s moving at speed and blocking bullets and hitting people. Snyder proves he can make it work perfectly, and then commits to doing the slow-motion thing anyway. By the end of the film I was quickly rolling my eyes when the screen slowed down.

Honestly at the start of this week, before reviews dropped, my expectations for this film were below the floor. In reality, I should have thought about it logically. This is a film that’s been worked on for half a decade at least, and in that time, it’s had the most rigorous test screening process you could imagine. Perhaps this is the version Snyder would have released in 2017 if he had the chance, but I don’t buy that. This film addresses so many of the complaints fans and critics had of the 2017 film that it’s clearly been made with those taken into consideration. This is, in so many ways, a unique piece of media. One which fans of these characters and superhero movies in general will find a lot of enjoyment in.

Where do DC go from here? That is an incredibly difficult question for them. They had a wild success with the Joker film, but that was completely disconnected. They then released Wonder Woman 84, which I found to be an absolute mess of a film. They have “The Batman” coming next with Robert Pattinson as Bruce Wayne, but that’s also set in another universe. On top of all that, Zack Snyder’s Justice League has proven that his vision was at the very least entertaining, and at times threatened to be great.

There is probably half-an-hour at the end of this film that feels like a cinematic universe worth of post credit scenes. One in particular features Jared Leto as a much more recognisable Joker, and his interaction with Ben Affleck as Batman really got me intrigued to see those two do something. This flurry of scenes doesn’t really fit in with the narrative that’s been told over the previous three and half hours, but they’re interesting little glimpses into what Snyder wants to do.

What comes next is anyone’s guess, but what we have right now is a Justice League film that DC can be proud of and fans can enjoy. It’s too long, it’s got some strange moments (Seriously that Viking singing was odd), and it has just too much slow motion. I ended it with a smile on my face though, and that’s a lot better than I expected.

Good: Fun action, a plot that makes sense, and that feeling of seeing your action figures thrown into each other.

Bad: Too much slow motion, some scenes could easily have been left out, and that weird Viking singing.

TL;DR : This is Justice League 2017 with context, character development, villain motivations and 100% less weird Henry Cavill lip CGI.

The Superman Problem

Late last week a few stories broke about DC not being entirely sure how to use Superman in their films. It’s a revelation that will shock very few, considering they’ve not touched the man of steel since Batman V Superman and Justice League where he was mishandled and used in odd ways. I think DC have been making some good moves lately, but their handling of Superman has shown they don’t understand what they have with the character. 

The character that started the Superhero film genre in the 70’s couldn’t catch a break in the 2010’s and has nothing planned for the 2020’s. Henry Cavill looks the part, and even acts the part superbly, but DC seem hesitant to go forward with anything involving the Kryptonian.

The age-old problem people immediately put forward with Superman is that he’s impervious to everything except a green rock, which is true, he is overpowered. That does not make it hard for him to be compelling though. One of the most interesting aspects of the character for me is not that he’s a godlike figure, but that he struggles to fit in anywhere.

He knows he doesn’t fit in with the people around him, but he’s grown up as one of them and lives among them. He loves a human woman, he has human friends, a normal job, and in all three of those situations he feels uncomfortable. If DC need a little bit of inspiration, they should watch Kill Bill 2, where Bill talks about superman.

“When Superman wakes up in the morning, he’s Superman. His alter ego is Clark Kent”

Man, of Steel did not take this angle, it made superman a reluctant hero who then had to step up into the role. To me, being Superman was always the easy part for the character. Saving people from falling buildings, punching villains, all that jazz is the easy part. The hard part is maintaining his Clark Kent persona. Diving into that side of him is a tough choice though, because it’s the part that doesn’t involve him being a superhero.

From that angle, the challenge with Superman isn’t making him compelling or relevant to audiences but making that fit into a modern superhero film. The action set pieces need agency and stakes, and there is only really two ways to do that with superman. Green rocks or kidnapping the ones he cares about. Of course, we have seen both ideas executed before.

Batman V Superman had the ingredients of a good superman story, the problem with that film stem from the over eagerness of the studio to cram in everyone and catch up to Marvel. They had an interesting Lex Luthor, but he was only a bit part character because they had to get to Batman, and cover Wonder Woman, and bring in doomsday to eventually kill superman. All in one film. It was too much and went beyond ambition into the realms of stupidity. Also, Batman might well kill people, but he’s not got much previous with just annihilating people with rockets and machine guns.

In Lex Luthor, we have an influential billionaire who people can easily find things to hate about. His power is his influence, and to me the dynamic between him and superman could potentially rival the Batman/Joker situation. The Superman film I want to see is Superman struggling with being a human whilst finding stopping super-villains a piece of cake. Then he should deal with facing a real human problem like having his reputation dragged and false stories leaked about him, an enemy he can’t punch or throw around to defeat.

Give Superman a problem that Clark Kent must deal with, then you force him into a position he’s uncomfortable in, and that makes for great drama. DC trying to fit Superman into the universe they have with Wonder Woman and Aquaman probably won’t work this way, as they need him to be even more powerful than those two, who at this point are gods. Maybe they should take a leaf out of the Joker book and make a standalone Superman story that isn’t connected to the rest of the DC Films.

I hope they don’t just bench the character and focus on everything else. I am not even the biggest Superman fan, but the character demands respect, as without his films in the 70s, we wouldn’t have any of these superhero films.

A nerdy one to start the week, probably in reaction to my Sunday which was spent watching NFL and the Premier League. ‘Til Tomorrow!

ChAzJS

 

Will Netflix give Witcher fans what they wa…..ok nevermind.

Henry Cavill is one hell of a man. Women want to be with him, Men also want to be with him regardless of their usual sexual preference. The new Netflix show The Witcher dropped its most recent trailer and of course it features a shot of him in a bath which led to the majority of the trailer being rendered obsolete. 

What is perhaps much more important for the Witcher series, is that the rest of the trailer looked like a very good show. The shots of Geralt have completely put to rest my concerns about that first promo shot we had of Cavill in the worst Lucius Malfoy wig in the world. He looks the part, and he’s committing to the borderline unlikable nature of the character I know from the games.

That brings me onto my next point, I find it bizarre that so far, I haven’t seen this series reference the hugely successful video game franchise at any point in its marketing. It is being based on the books, but there is no way the look of the games has not influenced it heavily. The action scenes we get glimpses of could be taken straight out of The Witcher 3 on a high-end PC, the Cavill spinning and swinging his sword just like you can in the game.

It does make me wonder if there is a general feeling that anything you attach to a video game franchise instantly gets the “Nobody can make a good video game adaption” stigma attached to it. I have to say I do kind of agree. If this was marketed more as a video game adaptation than a Book one, I think a lot of the target audience would have written it off already. As it is, they seem to be setting it up to fill the hole that Game of Thrones has left in fans tv schedule. It probably won’t match that shows political intrigue, but it looks like it’s going to knock its action out of the park, something I don’t think Game of Thrones ever did consistently.

I have been waiting for a new series to sink my teeth into and nothing has grabbed me until now, this new Witcher series has really piqued my curiosity. My history with the franchise is about 20 hours of a game that I felt completely overwhelmed by, and then I bailed and never went back. I did love the idea of the Witcher and the lore around that world though. Perhaps this TV show will be the perfect medium for me to enjoy that story.

If it turns out to be a mess story-wise, at least we will have a full season of watching Henry Cavill’s chiselled jawline, washboard abs and mountainous shoulders/arms. I would guess that is almost worth watching on its own for most people. The Witcher releases onto Netflix on 20th December, just a day after Star Wars here in the UK.

Have a great weekend!

ChAzJS

 

Mission Impossible Fallout Review

Mission Impossible Fallout is the sixth film in the Tom Cruise led franchise and looks to continue on the last two fantastic entries. For the first time we have a returning director and a continuing story so it was interesting to see how well the story carries over.

First things first though, Tom Cruise is fifty-six years old. That fact makes all of the stunts and sprinting around even hi somehow outdoing it’s predecessor. There’s a section of this film, possibly over half an hour, of just chase scenes. Speeding through Paris and London in cars, boats, bikes, and on foot, the way this is all captured so beautifully and shown so clearly is exceptional and sets a new standard for action films. Director Chris Macquarie and his team do an amazing job with every set piece, and there are a lot of them sprinkled throughout so that level of consistency is something to be admired.

Returning with the evergreen Tom Cruise in his lead role as Ethan Hunt are Ving Rhames, Simon Pegg, and Rebecca Ferguson. They serve as his back up and support team and they all show a vel of comraderie. All are good in the film, with Ferguson continuing to show she could potentially carry this franchise on after Cruise decides he’s too old for this (long way off I reckon). Missing from this one is Jeremy Renner, who couldn’t clear his schedule as Avengers was filming at the same time, only to then not be used in the Avengers film anyway so he missed out on both films. Bit of crap situation from all involved really but I have to say I didn’t realise he wasn’t there until afterwards when discussing the movie.

Joining for the first time is Angela Bassett in what will likely be the role that takes over from Alec Baldwin as the government official in the long term. Alongside her is Superman himself Henry Cavill in his second spy flick after the underappreciated Man from Uncle a couple of years ago. Cavill brings obvious physicality to the role but unfortunately his character didn’t have the depth I was hoping for. There’s a debut movie role for Vanessa Kirby, who is intriguing as a character that plays a side role here but may become more involved in future entries.

The other main cast member, and a crucial one, is Sean Harris returning as Solomon Lane. He was the undoubted highlight of Mission Impossible Rogue Nation for me, his quiet, creepy and calculated villain really giving something new to the franchise. He returns and is just as off-putting as before, but his motivations have now changed and he is more driven by a desire to get revenge on Ethan Hunt.

All of these interesting characters are mixed up in a simple plot, there’s three potential nuclear bombs and Ethan has to stop them going off. It is a pretty basic thing for a spy/action film but they do try to subvert your expectations in the challenge they pose to our protagonists.

The basic, easy to read plot is a little underwhelming and doesn’t deliver any real intrigue. I would liked more on Vanessa Kirby and Henry Cavills back story but that would have meant cutting out some of the action as this is already a long film clocking in at just shy of two and a half hours.

Mission Impossible Fallout features some of the best action sequences ever put to film, and that alone justifies the price of a ticket. Tom Cruise continues to defy the ageing process and deliver genuinely jaw dropping moments. Action movie fans will really get kick out of this film. It doesn’t quite reach the heights of Rogue Nation for me, as I liked the more challenging choices put infront of out characters, but it’s still an incredibly entertaining movie.

Good: for all action movie fans, mission impossible continues to deliver some of the best sequences in cinema today. Great musical score.

Bad: Predictable plot, antagonists not as compelling as I’d have liked.

8/10 – He’s fifty-bloody-six.